Concept Of God In Philosophy Essay

Please explain Im worlduel Kants ch notwithstandingenge to juvenile devotion. In an opposite(prenominal)(a) words, what is Kants epistemology, i.e., his theory of how benevolent worlds cont depot (how the mind functions)? According to this theory, tallyly, is it possible to whop rightlyeousness? Is it possible to piddle got innate association of divinity or to get wind immortal in his view? How would Christian theologians and believers, who wanted to demonstrate the rational intelligibility of popular opinion in and fellowship of god, do to this? (10 head paths). Immanuel Kant started with the guessing that the mind is enactmentive. It bods part in the mind of human bes especially if it is already acquainted with several(predicate) anatomys of ensure and unendingly imposes upon cognition in each(prenominal) forms presumption that it is still in the trace of human interpret. However he utter that non all things argon connected to from eac h ane separate because in a track, they be non observable which gives the presumption that its connectivity is not determined by that simple idea. And similarly, Kant feel out that we lack the infallible organ to fit all the information that the mind abide and may do. The mind kindlenot produce spangledge of such(prenominal) a transcendent being (The partition of the worship of Reason, p. 65).He to a fault showed that, matinee idol is supposed to be perfective in all aspects of life. He existed what was frame verbally by Anselm during the 11th degree Celsius and presented cover evidences for such actuation. However, he wishes not to oppose the human beings of God because it lead in addition oppose that the predicate of a fount is not pellucid to use. He added that it allow for be a useless thing to do since on that point will be no contradiction because of his given analogy.Since existence is not a predicate, if I decline Gods existence, I am not den ying a predicate of a subject hence no logical contradiction is involved as the prop mavennts of the aim contend. ( advanced(a) Christian Thought, p.66) And he also argued that in that respect is a limit for a human to our cause empirical k right awayledge against the everlasting(a) point of our op erative life. Instead, this empirical spangledge is completely independent and the principles of pure reason. Additionally, he utter that human act chastely not because of sway to a authorized lawsuit or object scarcely because of nonp beils consciousness of duty.To act morally is not to act from inclination or even prudence provided from a sense of duty (The Breakd hold of the Religion of Reason, p. 69)What atomic number 18 the slightly of the rough basic characteristics and values of the Enlightenment? What atomic number 18 the chief enlightenment values and how do these compargon with those values/characteristics of the medieval era? limit the Enlightenment view of license and reason. Use your text on e-reserve. Then, move how would a theologian (like me) regard the forebode and worry of these views from a theological (having to do with God) perspective? (5 points). The Enlightenment brought near potpourri in mans perception of the world and the confederacy. According to Kant that the gist of the said idea is something that is already embedded to the line of thought of a person and that it shows on up to what extent is a man capable or willing to do to suffice his pitch got interest.Underlying this complete movement is a renewed sense and trust in mans own capacities and appreciation of, interest in, and promise for human life on this priming coat (Modern Christian Thought, p.2) It was also during this period that totalitarianism and the emergence of individual reason started to splay amongst the spate. From this time on, in that respect is already a widespread of being liberated or freed from all entanglement to any perso n. It was then that autonomy is seen on a various perspective and remarkably, no matchless challenged the said idea. Accordingly, at that place is an new(prenominal) choose function during the time of Enlightenment. The act of reasoning also became widespread hobby Francis Bacon and John Locke. They are the ones who defied the commencement exercise idea given by Rene Descartes. It was then that Reason is treated as something that is a spanking and progressive tug the depth of its meaning can be deduced by its function which can create many avenues to determine fact from opinion.How does Friedrich Schleiermacher respond to Kants challenge to modern morality? How do human beings play along to populate God according to Schleiermacher? What, then, is the subject of divinity fudge for a theologian like Schleiermacher? (10 points) Schleiermacher be what he thinks to be the consecutive temper of trust and the conception of its idea. With this kind, on that point are ii (2) forms of faith such as theoretical or practical point of view. He added that pietism should be something different from a mixture of opinions well-nigh God and the world, and of precepts of for one life or two. He also argues that if pietism is the highest form of knowledge it should follow that reason or any scientific method can be measured by any organ. Also, he adds that if religion can be attained by reading materials such as books, journals, etc, then the intimately spectral person should also be the most intelligent one. And, he clarified that incomplete religion nor morality should be interchanged or be treated as the same. Religion is a feeling thus it is all a mental emotion claiming that it is an straightaway intuition or is based on one persons instinct. However, he clarified that God direct not to be present in any object or present Himself in such a way that He will be tangible for human. He said that no man is spectral because he was able to read doctri nes and follow it thoroughly and experience different kinds of things instead, piety emancipates from ones own veritable feeling and not because different plenty told him to be as such.What are some of the most basic characteristics and values of Romanticism, the ingenious movement of the 19th atomic number 6 which following(a) the Rationalism of the Enlightenment in the eighteenth century. How does Schleiermacher reflect the ideas of Romanticism? (5 points) Romanticism as what Schleiermacher take a leak seen it, it is a new way for modern religious thoughts allow a foundation or ground that will suffice the needs, interest and limited reviews of most passel especially the Philosophers. By giving this idea to the people, he wanted to show to them that what religion they have been rejecting all the mend is not at all the religion that they need to embrace and understand deeply. Rather, it is the external religion that they are despising all the while and that this kind o f religion is something that should not be studied or known at all. He also wanted to understand the opinions that were raised during that time about the religion on utilitarianism. Schleiermacher claims that if there is a sealed point when the issue is not unyielding with its true value, then it is something that should not be wasted time upon. However, he contradicts his own perception by saying that religion has a peculiar sense that is critical when talking about the spirit of man.Modern theology in the 19th century followed the thought of Friedrich Schleiermacher and his way of doing theology. What major event occurred at the beginning of the 20th century that convinced Karl Barth that the entire way of doing modern/ fine-looking theology was deeply disputable and morally breach? (5 points)One major event that made Barth think that doing free theology is problematic and morally bankrupt is when the Church always assumes that they are foolproof or those who does not do anything misemploy to any one and at the end of the day, surrender their selves to the Holy Spirit and deliveryman Christ.This is when Barth said that hermeneutical principles of subordination and surrender have nothing to do with the kind of biblical or ecclesial authoritarianism. Because according to him, having a superior and an inferior means that there should be an effort to remove ones self from interpretative process instead focus on neither human basic needs nor the intrust for authority.How does Karl Barth understand that human beings may come to know God? Do we have a natural capacity, i.e., an ability within human nature and thus by from God, to know God? (10 points) We should cultivate a life that is humble and each should not cease on praying before Him, earshot actively to His teachings in order for us to know what are the things that we genuinely need. He added that to let go of the material and human needs that we have right now is a preparation for us to know God fully. Leaving things would eventually realise us from knowing how the real God is and that we will have a frequently clearer understanding on why He created things. Also, by leaving things, we do not need to carry on an nimiety baggage that may sometimes abash us from knowing who God really is.What happens when human beings claim to know God on the basis of their own experience or their own thinking about God? What happens when human beings extend to know how Jesus was on the basis of their own historical reconstruction or psychological evaluation of him? Why is this so wicked? How is it to be avoided? Can it be avoided? What is the entirely way, according to Barth, that purely human thinking about God can be avoided? (10 points) When we experience things, it means that, in one way or another we have already met God. However, each person has a different meaning on things especially with their experiences. It can be connoted as something that is serious for them unless pleasant to others. That is why there is a misconception on which our God really should be. It is dangerous because people are worshipping other gods and is prone to misunderstanding especially to those who have a different encounter with their own gods. It can also be a way of having the society is fragmented since there are different sides of the story on how they were able to encounter god. Proper recitation of things can somehow avoid this kind of fragment among the people. However, only few are able to interpret the story wellspring and still leaves the danger hanging and vulnerable to anyone who tries to interpret anything.What is theology for Barth? How should the theologian drive to do theology? What do faith, prayer, and regard have to do with this method or way of theological reflection? Define faith, prayer, and obedience for Barth. (10 points) Obedience as it is being co-related to faith, according to Barth, is something that can simply deed on at moment of ones ch oosing. By these, it is one way for God to connect with his people and lay out them in their own freedom and history. free to say, ones interpretation of things should be accorded with obedience in order to examine ad hominem experience and relate it to the countersign or passage that is being taught. For him, the hold openrs should not write about anything that will be later on associated with them, rather they should write about an experience that is interlaying with the record that they are reviewing. With prayers, he said that it is not necessary to endlessly pray to God, admit it or not, we are not all the time confident that God is listening to our prayers.What is tidings according to Karl Barth? How does this reflect a deeply theological understanding, i.e., an understanding that comes from God. And, how does this reflect a deeply human and modern understanding of the habit of human beings in the piece of music of the password? Is the Bible already the cry of God i. e., the words on the page, for Barth, or does the Bible become the Word of God? If so, when does it become the Word of God? What happens to make it become the Word of God? (10 points) A word of honor, according to Barth is something that is written about God and will be relevant or at least be a human evidence of Gods existence and all the things that he did in history. He tends to interpret scriptures, known as hermeneutics, to help biblical scholars to understand the true meaning of each. And with that, he tends to extend some of his arms to other people in terms of helping them suffice whatsoever struggle they have. However, with his interpretations does not come any personal experience. He writes some of his experience but does not delve much on to it. Rather, he makes a deeper study on why those things were said and how the people did then accepted or spurned the fact that things are happening during their time. The Bible is the Word of God because it contains His teaching s and the moral lessons that we need to learn in life. However, not all teachings can be found in the Bible. Some should be experienced first hand in order for us to learn new things.According to rosemary Radford Ruether, what does all theology begin with? What is the problem with the so-called objective sources of Christian theology, i.e., scripture and tradition? And, what is unique about womens liberationist theology and the fiber of experience in theology according to Ruether? What is the hermeneutical circle of theological interpretation? What is the final norm/ measuring stick of theological truth? (10 points) piety is the testimony of ones faith, life and function to God. godliness actually questions it self whether or not they are true or not. in that respect are specific infer that is use in order for Theology to be considered true, they measure their action, talk about God, and if it is against the Church. It is also something that is alien with its own timeworn so urce and object. On the other hand, the feminist theology uses experience as a criterion for exploring a much deeper sense of study and critical forces based on the experience of males that eventually gives them the notion as a universal human experience.What is the oracular biblical principle interpreted from a feminist perspective? What are the tetrad main categories of feminist liberation theology? Cite biblical passages that show you understand how the Bible can be used to fight the root sin of command and subjugation. (5 points) Those females are only second-grade citizens compared to male. Because then, there is a stereotype in gender since other scholars claim that males are wiser than female. Also, the Patriarchal body exists that time and that same idea is model upon the image of God, reasoning that God is male. There is also a prophetic handed-down labeled as cultural vanity that makes true of the statement written above. It shows how the society is delving much on what they think is right because it is fair and just to all of them but on what is written in the scriptures.equality and contrast the theology of Karl Barth with that of Rosemary Radford Ruther? How would Karl Barth critique Ruether? What would he say about the role of experience and the potential dangers involved in such a kind of theology? What would Karl Barth say about God in her theology? Does she have a role for the objective action of God in the world or is God only actualized in our consciousness and social activeness for the poor and marginalized?How would Ruether respond to this critique? What would she say in her defense? In other words, what are the problems of beginning with scripture and tradition apart from womens experience according to Ruether? What would that do for or to women? Finally, how would Ruether criticize the theology of Karl Barth? What is the problem of beginning with revelation in scripture, and apart from womens experience, according to Ruether? (1 0 points) Barth and Ruether have completely different view points with regards to Theology and how they perceive such topic. With Barth, he is more of delving much on the experience of one person because from the experience they may be able to deduce something that is very vital for their survival. Also, he tends to focus more on the things that needs to be critically rewrite or interpreted using personal experiences he got from other people. Barth is also confided with the norms of the society. He was not able to explore on other possible things and did not try to convince other people that there are other possibilities regarding their study. With Ruether, she is more of a liberal thinker, given that there are points that she raised about feminist liberal theology. She was able to grasp on other ideas or methods to use in other to arrive at a much well interpreted scripture following the experiences of the writer or associating the moral of the scripture to any experience that of the writer.